<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spectator&#8217;s top wine a good choice, from a PR POV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.steveheimoff.com/index.php/2009/11/25/spectators-top-wine-a-good-choice-from-a-pr-pov/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.steveheimoff.com/index.php/2009/11/25/spectators-top-wine-a-good-choice-from-a-pr-pov/</link>
	<description>A blog about the world of wine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:13:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.steveheimoff.com/index.php/2009/11/25/spectators-top-wine-a-good-choice-from-a-pr-pov/comment-page-1/#comment-22550</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveheimoff.com/?p=4560#comment-22550</guid>
		<description>Like I said, it created buzz. And buzz is good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like I said, it created buzz. And buzz is good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.steveheimoff.com/index.php/2009/11/25/spectators-top-wine-a-good-choice-from-a-pr-pov/comment-page-1/#comment-22548</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveheimoff.com/?p=4560#comment-22548</guid>
		<description>So here is a question. Agree or not we all just spent days talking about the top 100 list and the Columbia Crest brand. Agree or not I think the choice of this wine perked up everyone’s ears to take a look at this years list. If they had said Caymus SS, Pegu, Latour, or something over $200 from Piedmont do you think any of us would have batted an eye. Don’t they say something like all press is good press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So here is a question. Agree or not we all just spent days talking about the top 100 list and the Columbia Crest brand. Agree or not I think the choice of this wine perked up everyone’s ears to take a look at this years list. If they had said Caymus SS, Pegu, Latour, or something over $200 from Piedmont do you think any of us would have batted an eye. Don’t they say something like all press is good press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Wino</title>
		<link>http://www.steveheimoff.com/index.php/2009/11/25/spectators-top-wine-a-good-choice-from-a-pr-pov/comment-page-1/#comment-22544</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Wino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveheimoff.com/?p=4560#comment-22544</guid>
		<description>I walked away from the WS Top 100 list this year totally befuddled.  I have the #1 and about 6 or 7 of other wines on the list in my cellar, some of which are cheap, some of which are more expensive, and none of which are over $70.  I cannot for the life of me see why those that I have opened - and no, I am not opening my Renatto Ratti or Cayuse yet - are in the list.  My conclusion is that it is silly to take the whole Top 100 seriously.  Change the title to &quot;100 Interesting Wines for 2009&quot; and don&#039;t spin it as an ultimate award, even on the broad criteria on which WS bases its decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I walked away from the WS Top 100 list this year totally befuddled.  I have the #1 and about 6 or 7 of other wines on the list in my cellar, some of which are cheap, some of which are more expensive, and none of which are over $70.  I cannot for the life of me see why those that I have opened &#8211; and no, I am not opening my Renatto Ratti or Cayuse yet &#8211; are in the list.  My conclusion is that it is silly to take the whole Top 100 seriously.  Change the title to &#8220;100 Interesting Wines for 2009&#8243; and don&#8217;t spin it as an ultimate award, even on the broad criteria on which WS bases its decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.steveheimoff.com/index.php/2009/11/25/spectators-top-wine-a-good-choice-from-a-pr-pov/comment-page-1/#comment-22366</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveheimoff.com/?p=4560#comment-22366</guid>
		<description>CA Winediva, thanks for the compliment to Wine Enthusiast. Always nice to hear somebody likes us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CA Winediva, thanks for the compliment to Wine Enthusiast. Always nice to hear somebody likes us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CA Winediva</title>
		<link>http://www.steveheimoff.com/index.php/2009/11/25/spectators-top-wine-a-good-choice-from-a-pr-pov/comment-page-1/#comment-22362</link>
		<dc:creator>CA Winediva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveheimoff.com/?p=4560#comment-22362</guid>
		<description>Well, we tasted old #1 over the weekend, and wern&#039;t very impressed.  Although we had to pretend to be.  A friend who is a *collector*,  brought several bottles over to share, he was so proud.  He bought cases of the stuff on release.  It&#039;s a very average bottle of wine, and at 27 bucks I think overpriced.  No complexity going on at all.  We&#039;re not big fans of WS, as they are a bit full of themselves.  WE is more to our taste.  Is it fair or scary to say *fair and balanced*?

With so much really good wine out in the world at good prices, think Buheler Napa Cab, or, Hess Mt. Veeder Cuvee.......ya gotta wonder why they picked that one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, we tasted old #1 over the weekend, and wern&#8217;t very impressed.  Although we had to pretend to be.  A friend who is a *collector*,  brought several bottles over to share, he was so proud.  He bought cases of the stuff on release.  It&#8217;s a very average bottle of wine, and at 27 bucks I think overpriced.  No complexity going on at all.  We&#8217;re not big fans of WS, as they are a bit full of themselves.  WE is more to our taste.  Is it fair or scary to say *fair and balanced*?</p>
<p>With so much really good wine out in the world at good prices, think Buheler Napa Cab, or, Hess Mt. Veeder Cuvee&#8230;&#8230;.ya gotta wonder why they picked that one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

