<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is there life after Twitter? Here are 2 guys who hope so</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.steveheimoff.com/index.php/2009/07/10/is-there-life-after-twitter-here-are-2-guys-who-hope-so/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.steveheimoff.com/index.php/2009/07/10/is-there-life-after-twitter-here-are-2-guys-who-hope-so/</link>
	<description>A blog about the world of wine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:04:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan</title>
		<link>http://www.steveheimoff.com/index.php/2009/07/10/is-there-life-after-twitter-here-are-2-guys-who-hope-so/comment-page-1/#comment-11036</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveheimoff.com/?p=3324#comment-11036</guid>
		<description>I suppose one direction could be to create a more efficient search which advertisers must pay for in order to manage their brand interactions on Twitter. That way they receive value in exchange for the service and customers are not bombarded in way which is unfitting for the medium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose one direction could be to create a more efficient search which advertisers must pay for in order to manage their brand interactions on Twitter. That way they receive value in exchange for the service and customers are not bombarded in way which is unfitting for the medium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie Tadayon</title>
		<link>http://www.steveheimoff.com/index.php/2009/07/10/is-there-life-after-twitter-here-are-2-guys-who-hope-so/comment-page-1/#comment-11032</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie Tadayon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveheimoff.com/?p=3324#comment-11032</guid>
		<description>Hi Steve

Honestly, my initial reaction would be, &quot;Ugh.  What the heck is that?  Turn that thing off!&quot; But if it were the only pop-up video I&#039;d see for the day, I suppose I would be alright with it.  I guess I&#039;m just saying we need to be prepared for the inevitable.  

I don&#039;t think Twitter can survive without paying advertisers, so I expect paid ads to one day be the norm on Twitter.  However, knowing how many people are against ads, I think that Evan and Biz will take those protests into consideration and only place the most non-obtrusive ads on the site.  Oxymoron, I know.

Laurie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve</p>
<p>Honestly, my initial reaction would be, &#8220;Ugh.  What the heck is that?  Turn that thing off!&#8221; But if it were the only pop-up video I&#8217;d see for the day, I suppose I would be alright with it.  I guess I&#8217;m just saying we need to be prepared for the inevitable.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Twitter can survive without paying advertisers, so I expect paid ads to one day be the norm on Twitter.  However, knowing how many people are against ads, I think that Evan and Biz will take those protests into consideration and only place the most non-obtrusive ads on the site.  Oxymoron, I know.</p>
<p>Laurie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.steveheimoff.com/index.php/2009/07/10/is-there-life-after-twitter-here-are-2-guys-who-hope-so/comment-page-1/#comment-11023</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveheimoff.com/?p=3324#comment-11023</guid>
		<description>Laurie, what would you think if you opened Twitter and there was a popup video from (say) some bank with a talking head telling you how great their interest rate is and you can&#039;t shut if off until it&#039;s finished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laurie, what would you think if you opened Twitter and there was a popup video from (say) some bank with a talking head telling you how great their interest rate is and you can&#8217;t shut if off until it&#8217;s finished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie Tadayon</title>
		<link>http://www.steveheimoff.com/index.php/2009/07/10/is-there-life-after-twitter-here-are-2-guys-who-hope-so/comment-page-1/#comment-11022</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie Tadayon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveheimoff.com/?p=3324#comment-11022</guid>
		<description>Once people begin to view Twitter in the same way as they do radio and TV, I think they will become more accepting of ads.  The main difference between Twitter and radio/TV is that with Twitter, the &quot;viewer/listener&quot; is creating some of the content, viewing the rest, which has also been created by a different consumer.  

With radio/TV, we&#039;re more passive.  It&#039;s not our programming.  We have less say in it.  So I think there&#039;s some resentment on Twitter (it&#039;s &quot;ours!&quot;) about having ads infiltrate &quot;our&quot; content, &quot;our&quot; thoughts, &quot;our&quot; tweets.  The truth of the matter is, once you tweet, that tweet is no longer yours.  And Twitter has every right to get an advertiser to help them bring you &quot;your&quot; tweet.  

This is not a free world.  I&#039;m all for Twitter advertisements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once people begin to view Twitter in the same way as they do radio and TV, I think they will become more accepting of ads.  The main difference between Twitter and radio/TV is that with Twitter, the &#8220;viewer/listener&#8221; is creating some of the content, viewing the rest, which has also been created by a different consumer.  </p>
<p>With radio/TV, we&#8217;re more passive.  It&#8217;s not our programming.  We have less say in it.  So I think there&#8217;s some resentment on Twitter (it&#8217;s &#8220;ours!&#8221;) about having ads infiltrate &#8220;our&#8221; content, &#8220;our&#8221; thoughts, &#8220;our&#8221; tweets.  The truth of the matter is, once you tweet, that tweet is no longer yours.  And Twitter has every right to get an advertiser to help them bring you &#8220;your&#8221; tweet.  </p>
<p>This is not a free world.  I&#8217;m all for Twitter advertisements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.steveheimoff.com/index.php/2009/07/10/is-there-life-after-twitter-here-are-2-guys-who-hope-so/comment-page-1/#comment-10991</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 22:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steveheimoff.com/?p=3324#comment-10991</guid>
		<description>Please rush the check, I can use the money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please rush the check, I can use the money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

